Considering Quadratic Voting for Pareto Optimal Governance

Self-Introduction

Introducing [Quadratic Voting

https://gyazo.com/ae59538d618ab54aea9f35ed93aa9fdf

Pure [one person, one vote

As a Premise

All ABC tied for first place

2つづつ当てはめるもので運用すると、[Circulation

While running a company called Civichat, the government was not doing the work it should have done

If I had known about such a system, I would have used it

https://gyazo.com/b88de88e312e3ae218bb59f3c1951812

The Role that I Think the "Administrative Government" Should Originally Play

民意を反映しながらパレート最適な[Consensus

Thinking with Specific Examples

https://gyazo.com/5dfbed9d46aeaa73386c61776566890f

つまり、「[How big of a problem it is for the person involved

問題への関心の深さ

https://gyazo.com/364104f17c9edbc5d6186531673e24c3

The lower the cost, the better

By Nils living in this city, the balance between benefits and costs will shift from A to B.

The reason why the cost of purchasing one vote is squared is clear from the example of the power plant earlier.

This allows reflecting the "intensity of preference"

Actually Used in the Field

https://gyazo.com/c11cbac8ac0b6492f12fd1575adb5d89

https://gyazo.com/b6092c6e50329766f00dd2bca74b12ff

https://gyazo.com/8030a1821cf8397ef3b40fc642b06e13

https://gyazo.com/632eaf262c09c49b3e57e4f82b27f877 https://note.com/tasaki_tomohiro/n/n8f0dd76ecd00

How does everyone think?

Reference